Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
9/15/2024, 1:38:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
489d
@cgsawmill @GaryMarcus @ronawang If you’re into things like the First, Fourth, 5Th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, yeah: You read correctly.

Why do you think @RobertKennedyJr endorsed @realDonaldTrump?
Peaky Blenders
@cgsawmill
·
489d
@olivia_p_walker @GaryMarcus @ronawang "to ensure our democracy doesn’t fall off a cliff"
🤡🤡
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
489d
@GaryMarcus @ronawang Gary, melt down how? Be specific. And no disrespect but is this just about you obviously not liking him? Or, what.

He’s running badass companies and is working to ensure our democracy doesn’t fall off a cliff. Plus the whole “genius, touch-of-madness” thing. Or did I miss…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
490d
@ronawang my opinion:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
490d
We are watching Elon meltdown in real-time. If his friends cared for him, truly cared for him, they would intervene.
Rona Wang
@ronawang
·
490d
you can learn a lot about a guy from his opinion on elon musk

The statement 'Trump would slaughter the Constitution as he did on 1/6 and with choice of judges' constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the actions of a former president and their impact on constitutional principles. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a strong disapproval of Trump's actions and judicial appointments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('slaughter') that could be seen as inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly Donald Trump, as it uses harsh and accusatory language. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. (-1 point) [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a personal attack on Trump. (-2 points) [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its inflammatory nature. (-1 point) [-1]