The statement by @MarkRuffalo and the subsequent response by another user mentioning @Yoshua_Bengio and others constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI regulation and calls for responsible action from a public official.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for responsible AI regulation, which aims to mitigate risks associated with AI. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by calling for responsible AI practices that consider societal impacts. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a public official and encouraging collaboration among various organizations and individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for responsible AI regulation. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.