In reply to:
David Manheim ✈️ UK Sep 17-18 ✈️ NYC Sep 19-22
@davidmanheim
·
491d
The statement 'have written to author to clarify' by @davidmanheim is a response to a discussion about the performance of different GPT models in a reverse-tic-tac-toe task. The conversation involves a critique of the models' performance and a clarification about the versions of the models being discussed. The tone of the statement is neutral and aims to seek clarification, which is constructive in nature.
- The statement strives to do no harm as it seeks clarification rather than making any accusatory or harmful remarks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by attempting to clarify a potential misunderstanding about the models. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by seeking clarification rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.