In reply to:
whatsupfranks
@WhatsupFranks
·
491d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about media practices and the interpretation of a public figure's comments. The tone is critical and seeks to challenge the interpretation provided by @WhatsupFranks.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does seek to clarify a point of contention.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the interpretation of a comment, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.