Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in a public debate about the political efficacy and legitimacy of Jill Stein and the Green Party, responding to criticisms from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and others. It addresses public issues related to electoral politics, party dynamics, and democratic processes.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but is defensive and confrontational in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a public dispute that could be seen as undermining the dignity of the individuals involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending a position and countering criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by providing factual counterpoints but also contains elements of personal attack, particularly in the context of the ongoing dispute. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse, though the tone could be more respectful and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.