Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by the user seems to be a part of a larger public discourse involving political figures and their electoral success. The tone is somewhat confrontational and appears to be aimed at discrediting @AOC while supporting @DrJillStein. The intent is to highlight the perceived electoral success of Dr. Jill Stein in comparison to AOC, suggesting that AOC is struggling to accept this reality.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment by engaging in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of @AOC by implying she is struggling to accept reality. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to aim at discrediting @AOC. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It appears to be a personal attack on @AOC's ability to process electoral outcomes. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in a confrontational and somewhat dismissive manner. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.