Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Rep. Ruwa Romman
@Ruwa4Georgia
·
475d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political strategies and implications surrounding Jill Stein, Kamala Harris, and the topic of U.S. foreign policy towards Israel. The tone is critical and defensive, aiming to counter an argument made by another user about manipulation and the intelligence of voters.
- The statement does not appear to do harm directly, but it does use strong language ('offensive and weak') which could be seen as confrontational. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but uses a generalization about Arab Americans being 'the angriest,' which could be seen as stereotyping. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending a position and criticizing the opposing view. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but also includes a personal attack by calling the argument 'offensive and weak.' This detracts from a purely constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a political debate, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.