In reply to:
The statement 'Yes, actually. Read it again.' is a brief and dismissive reply to a tweet that discusses serious public issues such as fascism and misinformation. The original tweet by @TyrantLeto touches on significant societal concerns, but the reply does not substantively engage with these issues.
- The reply does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could be seen as unhelpful in a serious discussion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The reply does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the original poster by being dismissive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The reply does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the original poster's attempt to explain their position. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is dismissive and does not address the content of the original tweet in a meaningful way. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.