Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to political stances and activism, particularly concerning Palestine and the actions of public figures. The tone is supportive and admiring towards @rania_masri while critical of @Ruwa4Georgia.
- The statement does not appear to do harm directly, but it does criticize @Ruwa4Georgia, which could be seen as harmful depending on the context and the nature of the criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but engages in a public critique of @Ruwa4Georgia, which could be seen as bordering on harassment if not done constructively. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards @rania_masri's stance but does not extend the same empathy towards @Ruwa4Georgia.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with @Ruwa4Georgia and instead seems to take a side without fostering a constructive conversation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support @rania_masri's activism, which could be seen as for the betterment of society depending on one's perspective on the issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express support for a public figure, but the responsibility and integrity of the critique towards @Ruwa4Georgia could be questioned.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.