Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Team Stein/Ware 2024
@TeamJillStein
·
472d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with political issues, specifically the legal battles between the Democratic Party and the Green Party, and the broader implications for electoral politics. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, suggesting a coordinated effort by the Democratic Party to undermine the Green Party. The statement also calls for action by encouraging support for the Green Party's campaign efforts.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language such as 'lawfare,' 'fake progressives,' and 'absolute panic mode,' which can escalate tensions and contribute to a hostile political environment. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly by labeling specific individuals as 'fake progressives,' which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and antagonism between political groups. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses derogatory language and does not provide a reasoned argument or evidence to support its claims. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to mobilize support for the Green Party, which can be seen as an attempt to influence political outcomes. However, the approach lacks integrity due to its accusatory and divisive tone.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.