The statement addresses the credibility of well-known political analysts and polling organizations, suggesting that if someone consistently finds them to be wrong, the issue might lie with their own perspective. The tone is somewhat confrontational and challenges the reader to self-reflect on their own biases or understanding.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive or confrontational, which might indirectly cause emotional harm to those it addresses. It does not explicitly violate the principle but could be more considerate in its tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement encourages self-reflection, which can promote understanding and empathy. However, the confrontational tone might undermine this goal by putting the reader on the defensive.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by challenging the reader to reconsider their stance. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but could be more constructive in its approach. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.