Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with substantive public issues, specifically the state of the primary system in the United States and the potential for positive change through ranked choice voting. The tone is informative and aims to promote a discussion on electoral reform.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions, as it is focused on discussing electoral reform in a neutral and informative manner. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by aiming to educate the audience on ranked choice voting and its benefits. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement encourages constructive dialogue by inviting a discussion with a public figure and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence for the betterment of society by addressing potential improvements in the electoral system. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by focusing on a substantive public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.