The statement by @GaryMarcus and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue related to customer service and the use of AI in handling customer complaints. The tone of the statement is frustrated and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived failure in service and the limitations of AI in customer support.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement by @GaryMarcus expresses frustration but does not appear to intend harm. However, it does publicly criticize the company, which could be seen as harmful to its reputation. The reply by @hotelsdotcom is respectful and seeks to resolve the issue.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the company's service rather than attacking individuals. The reply by @hotelsdotcom also respects privacy by asking for a DM to handle the issue privately.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement by @GaryMarcus does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but rather highlights a negative experience. The reply by @hotelsdotcom attempts to address the issue constructively.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism of the company's service, though it is quite negative. The reply by @hotelsdotcom seeks to engage in dialogue to resolve the issue.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses the platform to highlight a public issue related to customer service and AI, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society by advocating for better service. The reply by @hotelsdotcom shows a willingness to address the issue.
[+1]