In reply to:
Steve Jones (he/him)
@mosesjones
·
494d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
494d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about the methodology and effectiveness of using tools in AI models, specifically in the context of accuracy in mathematical calculations. The tone is constructive and seeks to clarify the methodology used in the study, suggesting that tools should be used reliably without user intervention.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on improving understanding of the methodology, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging the use of tools to improve accuracy, which aligns with the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation and suggesting a way to improve the methodology, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.