Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically an alleged attack by Israel in Lebanon that resulted in civilian casualties. It critiques the action as a violation of international humanitarian law and its implications for US efforts, making it a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by the attack, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness of the issue. However, it does not directly address how the statement itself might avoid causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the actions of a state rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the consequences of the attack and the importance of international humanitarian law, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the actions of a state, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By raising awareness of the alleged violation of international humanitarian law, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.