Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI, its potential benefits, and risks. It calls for a balanced approach to AI development and regulation, which is a significant societal concern.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a balanced approach to AI, which aims to mitigate risks while capitalizing on benefits. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging a collective effort to find a balanced approach to AI. It emphasizes the need for collaboration and shared responsibility. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by highlighting the need for a middle way between hype and doom, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by addressing a critical issue and encouraging a balanced, thoughtful approach to AI. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by promoting a balanced discussion on AI. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.