In reply to:
Bindu Reddy
@bindureddy
·
489d
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the significant issue of AI alignment and the challenges faced in adversarial machine learning. The discussion highlights the difficulties in achieving robust solutions in AI and the importance of learning from past mistakes to avoid future pitfalls.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to strive to do no harm by sharing valuable insights and warnings from past research, aiming to prevent future failures in AI alignment. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the challenges faced in adversarial machine learning and encouraging researchers to learn from past mistakes. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a critical analysis of past research efforts and offering advice to current researchers, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence for the betterment of society by addressing a critical issue in AI research and encouraging responsible and effective approaches to solving alignment problems. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.