Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses public issues, specifically political accountability and international conflict, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived shortcomings in political accountability and public response.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('creepy') that could be seen as inflammatory. This partially aligns with the principle but could be more measured.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'herd like' and 'creepy' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and accountability but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not foster empathy or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but uses terms like 'herd like' and 'creepy,' which could be seen as personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and addresses significant public issues, but the tone could be more responsible and measured to uphold integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.