Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
466d
The statement and related conversations constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues, specifically the alleged actions of the Democratic Party to remove a candidate from the ballot in New Hampshire. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that the Democratic Party is undermining democratic principles by limiting voter choice.
- The statement does not directly promote harm, but the accusatory tone could contribute to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful to the Democratic Party. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy; it is more focused on rallying support against perceived injustice. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it uses a confrontational tone and does not invite dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of voter choice, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for more democratic options. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion, but the confrontational tone may not be the most responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.