Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses the issue of political endorsements by unions, specifically the Teamsters' decision not to endorse Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. It also calls for other major unions to reconsider their endorsements of the Democratic Party unless they receive tangible benefits in return. The tone is critical and suggests a strategic approach to political endorsements.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is critical but not harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes a strategic approach to political endorsements but does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of unions' endorsement strategies without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage unions to act in their best interest, which can be seen as an attempt to better their position in society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss political endorsements.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.