Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 250

The statement addresses a highly sensitive and significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza and the casualties resulting from it. The tone is serious and accusatory, suggesting that the actions described constitute genocide rather than self-defense. The statement aims to provoke a strong emotional response and calls attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight the harm being done to civilians, particularly babies, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could potentially escalate tensions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the victims by not disclosing personal details but could be seen as inflammatory, which might indirectly contribute to cyberbullying or hate speech. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote empathy and compassion by highlighting the deaths of babies, but the use of the term 'genocide' is highly charged and could polarize opinions rather than foster understanding.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a strong accusation, which could be seen as a form of personal attack against those responsible for the actions described. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to draw attention to a humanitarian issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a highly charged manner, which may not be seen as responsible or with integrity by all audiences. [-1]