The statement 'When did Goodman’s endorsement become a positive?' is a response to a tweet about Goldman Sachs predicting stronger job growth and GDP growth if Kamala Harris wins the Presidency over Donald Trump. The tone appears to be skeptical or critical of the endorsement from Goldman Sachs, questioning its value or credibility.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the skeptical tone could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and questioning. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a rhetorical question that could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.