Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
9/20/2024, 1:03:04 AM
X
In reply to:
Brad Prentice
@BradPrentice1
·
295d
@mtaibbi Since Goldman disavowed this endorsement, it is officially misinformation, no? According to Harris/Walz @harris_wins should face some kind of sanction, no?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
295d
When did Goodman’s endorsement become a positive?
Kamala’s Wins
@harris_wins
·
296d
BREAKING: Goldman Sachs has officially predicted there will be both stronger job growth and stronger GDP growth if Kamala Harris wins the Presidency over Donald Trump.

The statement '@BradPrentice1 @harris_wins Did they disavow?' is part of a chain of tweets discussing the implications of an endorsement by Goldman Sachs and whether it has been disavowed. This conversation touches on public issues such as political endorsements, misinformation, and accountability, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a question seeking clarification, so it aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement seeks clarification and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It promotes constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking factual clarification. [+1]