Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a serious public issue, specifically the safety concerns of Lebanese people and the government's response to a perceived war crime. The tone is accusatory and urgent, calling for a specific policy action (ending arms sales to Israel).
- The statement aims to highlight a serious issue and call for action, but the accusatory tone and strong language could potentially incite harm or hostility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on condemnation and a call to action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses strong language and personal attacks (e.g., 'cowardly failure'). [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to call for a policy change, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but the approach is confrontational. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue, but the tone and language could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.