Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 86

The statement addresses the public issue of immigration policy, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is prescriptive and authoritative, aiming to outline principles for immigration. The intent appears to be to influence public opinion and policy on immigration by setting forth specific criteria for consent and removal of migrants.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not explicitly promote harm, but the rigid stance on removal could be seen as lacking compassion, potentially causing harm to individuals who migrate out of necessity. This results in a minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not explicitly respect the dignity of migrants either. This is a neutral point.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards migrants. It focuses on a utilitarian view of migration, which is a significant violation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is focused on policy rather than individuals, which is a neutral point.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for a specific immigration policy, but it does not clearly aim for the betterment of society as a whole, focusing instead on a narrow view of benefit. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on immigration policy. This is a neutral point.