Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement 'Democrats don't want you to have the choice to vote against a genocide. Think about that.' is a part of a broader conversation that addresses public issues, specifically electoral processes and political choices. The tone is accusatory and provocative, aiming to criticize the Democratic Party's actions in New Hampshire. The intent is to mobilize support and donations for Jill Stein's campaign by framing the issue as a moral imperative.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by accusing Democrats of supporting genocide, which is a serious and inflammatory claim. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by making a severe accusation without substantial evidence, which can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses divisive language that could deepen political polarization. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping and personal attack on the Democratic Party, which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to mobilize support for a political campaign, but it does so in a way that could be seen as divisive rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to the inflammatory and accusatory nature of the language. [-1]