Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Uncommitted National Movement 🌺
@uncommittedmvmt
·
462d
The statement and the linked conversation appear to engage with public issues, specifically political engagement and policy change, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but it does imply a conflict with 'pro-war forces,' which could be seen as divisive. However, it does not explicitly promote harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes a political entity (AIPAC) but does not attack individuals or use derogatory language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting a commitment to policy change and engagement, although it could be more constructive in its tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It criticizes a political stance rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for policy change and political engagement, which can be seen as an effort to better society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform to voice a political stance responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.