Ian Miles Cheong
@stillgray
·
302d
The statement critiques the role of censorship in a digital exchange, suggesting that it hindered a productive conversation. It implies a concern with free speech and the quality of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the negative impact of censorship on productive exchanges. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the 'censorship-industrial complex' without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing censorship and advocating for open dialogue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.