Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a public issue related to media access and transparency in international diplomacy, specifically concerning the White House's handling of press coverage during meetings between President Biden and other leaders of the Quad. The tone suggests a critique of the perceived inconsistency in media access granted to different delegations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a concern about transparency, which is a legitimate public issue. No points deducted or added.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. No points deducted or added.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise a valid concern about media access and transparency. No points deducted or added.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the actions of the White House without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue rather than individuals. No points deducted or added.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise a concern about media access and transparency, which is a responsible use of the platform. +1 point. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.