Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus and the subsequent replies by @olivia_p_walker and the unnamed user constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the potential risks and regulatory concerns related to AI, drawing parallels to the catastrophic failure of the Titan submersible. The unnamed user's reply promotes their book as a resource for understanding various risks, which is relevant to the ongoing discussion about AI safety and regulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm and aims to contribute to the discussion by offering additional information through a book. It aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a resource that could provide more insight into the risks being discussed. It aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a resource that could help answer the question posed by @olivia_p_walker. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the user's influence to promote a resource that could contribute to the betterment of society by enhancing understanding of AI risks. It aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]