Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue involving political figures, legal actions, and accusations of bias, which are relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized environment by highlighting a sensitive accusation without additional context. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a controversial accusation without fostering dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but does not facilitate constructive criticism or dialogue either. Neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly by reporting on a public issue. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.