Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the timeline and feasibility of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). The tone is skeptical and analytical, aiming to challenge prevailing opinions in the field of AI research and entrepreneurship.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a reasoned critique rather than an attack, so it aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning a widely held belief and encouraging further discussion on the topic. It aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by presenting a skeptical view without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a critical discussion on a public issue. It aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.