Jake Tapper

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the qualifications and conduct of a political candidate. The tone is critical and aims to inform the public about the candidate's behavior, which is relevant to the civic dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to inform the public about potentially harmful behavior of a political candidate, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by preventing an unfit candidate from taking office. However, the language used ('vile insults' and 'utterly unqualified') could be seen as harsh and potentially harmful. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent by focusing on the public behavior of a political figure. However, it does engage in a form of public shaming, which could be seen as a violation of this principle. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of a political opponent but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to inform the public about a candidate's behavior, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by ensuring informed voting decisions. [+2]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to inform the public, but the tone and language could be more responsible and measured. [+1]