Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by @GovWhitmer, declining to weigh in on the argument between Michigan AG Dana Nessel and Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, constitutes public discourse as it touches upon a public issue involving accusations of antisemitism and bias in legal charges, which are significant societal concerns.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions as it refrains from taking a side in a potentially inflammatory debate. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement avoids personal attacks or ad hominem arguments by not engaging in the argument at all. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by choosing not to escalate the situation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.