Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by @ErinMPerinne appears to be a comment on a political strategy for Republicans in North Carolina, suggesting they should distance themselves from the controversy surrounding the Republican nominee for governor. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue and contributes to the civic dialogue about political strategies and controversies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does suggest a divisive strategy which could be seen as indirectly harmful to party unity.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on political strategy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a strategic suggestion rather than a critique of individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest a political strategy, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of the party's chances in elections, though it does not explicitly aim for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly, though it is focused on political strategy rather than broader societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.