Gary Marcus

The statement 'Yes.' is a brief affirmation in response to a discussion about the importance of building AI to detect misinformation and the necessity of programming it fairly and without bias. While it is part of a larger conversation that constitutes public discourse, the statement itself is too concise to substantively engage with the public issue at hand.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm but is too brief to actively promote doing no harm.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity but does not engage deeply enough to address cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its brevity.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes, but it does not make any mistakes either.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society due to its lack of substantive content.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its lack of depth.