Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a significant public issue related to technology, AI development, and legal frameworks, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and suggests a concern about the influence and demands of tech monopolists like Google.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about potential harm from tech monopolies, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a critical issue, though it could be more empathetic and compassionate.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Google's actions but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.