The statement 'This is unconscionable.' in response to the conversation about an active duty soldier's visa issues for his pregnant wife and the comparison to illegal immigration constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue related to immigration policy and military service.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses strong disapproval of the situation, which can be seen as a call for change.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the issue rather than attacking individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight a perceived injustice, which can evoke empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It criticizes a policy rather than individuals.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight a societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by pointing out a perceived flaw in the system.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to bring attention to an issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.