Seamus Blackley
@SeamusBlackley
·
426d
The statement and the referenced conversation involve a critique of the quality of intellectual discussions on a platform, which can be considered a public issue. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does place blame on a public figure, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. However, it is not overtly malicious.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It mentions a public figure in a critical context but does not violate their privacy or dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critique rather than constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the influence of a public figure on the quality of discussions, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly. It does not spread misinformation or engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.