Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement by former CIA Director Leon Panetta addresses a significant public issue, specifically the characterization of Israel's explosive pager operation as terrorism. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public debate on international security and terrorism.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm with words and actions, but it does use strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. This could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more accusatory in nature, which could be seen as a minor violation of promoting empathy and compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions rather than individuals, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a significant public issue. However, the strong language could be seen as a minor violation of using the platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.