In reply to:
Adam McKay
@ZombiePanther2
·
123d
The statement by @ZombiePanther2 criticizes mainstream media (MSM) journalists for allegedly acting as mere stenographers for powerful institutions like the Pentagon, White House, and DNC, rather than engaging in independent journalism. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a lack of journalistic integrity and independence. The intent appears to be to call attention to perceived biases and failures within the media landscape, particularly in relation to political coverage.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a broader narrative of distrust in media, which might indirectly cause harm by undermining public trust in journalism. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of professional conduct rather than a personal attack. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism than on fostering a constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions. It also does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about media integrity. However, the responsibility and integrity of the critique could be questioned due to its accusatory tone. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.