Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 167
9/23/2024, 4:07:23 AM
X
In reply to:
We are the Asteroid; Look in the Mirror
@EndoceneHunter
·
123d
@marwilliamson @ZombiePanther2 Those people were never journalists.

Real journalists exist at the margins, ostracized and banished from corporate media because they have standards, morals, ethics, integrity. They don’t sell out to fiction, but stand for truth.

Calling propagandists journalists is dereliction
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
123d
@ZombiePanther2 MSM journalists have become in too many cases mere stenographers, receiving Pentagon, White House, DNC etc. talking points and merely passing them along as news.
Adam McKay
@ZombiePanther2
·
123d
Never forget the names of the news outlets & “journalists” that covered up Biden’s decline for years.

A lot of us began hearing things 2 years ago.
Why was legacy news media silent?
RNC Research
@RNCResearch
·
124d
BIDEN: "Uhh, who am I introducing next? WHO'S NEXT?"

He is completely and totally cooked — and Kamala Harris covered it up.

The statement by @EndoceneHunter and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the role and integrity of journalists and media outlets in society. The conversation addresses public concerns about media bias, journalistic standards, and the influence of corporate and political entities on news reporting.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does contribute to a polarized view of journalists, which could indirectly harm the reputation of those in the profession. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a group (journalists) rather than targeting individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and somewhat divisive, focusing on the negative aspects of journalism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the profession and the actions of journalists in general terms. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. However, the responsibility and integrity of the statement could be questioned due to its polarizing nature. [+1]