Andrew Yang

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 143

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue—legalized sports betting—and its societal impacts. The tone is serious and data-driven, aiming to inform and possibly influence public opinion or policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by highlighting potential negative consequences of legalized sports betting, such as personal bankruptcies and abuse. It aims to inform the public about these harms, aligning with the principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses data to promote understanding of the issue, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by the negative consequences of sports betting. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue and the data, adhering to constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By raising awareness about the potential harms of legalized sports betting, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society, encouraging informed decision-making. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a data-driven perspective on a public issue. [+2]