Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement by the user constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically addressing the conduct of a public official and the implications of their statements on societal justice.
- The statement accuses the attorney general of misleading and confusing people, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. This could be a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse the attorney general of lying, which could be seen as disrespectful. This is a minor violation of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on accusing the attorney general of lying, which could polarize rather than unite. This is a minor violation of promoting understanding and empathy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by accusing the attorney general of lying and misleading people. This is a significant violation of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible by making serious accusations without providing evidence. This is a minor violation of using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.