Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and accompanying image address a serious and contentious issue involving allegations of war crimes, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is accusatory and the intent appears to be to highlight and condemn actions perceived as violations of international law.
- The statement aims to highlight harm being done, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone without presenting evidence could potentially escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting individuals but focuses on actions of a state. However, it could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a call for dialogue or resolution. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, and instead makes strong accusations without presenting evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack on a state. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a serious issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the lack of evidence and accusatory tone may undermine this goal. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.