Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 95

The statement 'I said the opposite' by @Boowhoooo in response to a conversation about nuclear non-proliferation and political candidates does constitute public discourse. It engages with a substantive public issue—nuclear proliferation—and is part of a broader dialogue about political stances and policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a clarification rather than an attack or harmful comment.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a brief clarification without elaboration.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward clarification.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. It contributes to the dialogue without violating integrity.