Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 125
9/24/2024, 2:22:34 AM
X
In reply to:
AdiosAmigos
@NeverfallNM
·
341d
@NathanSuko43435 @marwilliamson is an addict of religion though.

She believes in wizards and magic and stuff.

A leader can't believe a God-Wizard controls earth.

It is insane to believe that in 2024.
Nathan Suko
@NathanSuko43435
·
404d
As someone who was raised in the rooms of narcotics anonymous with a mother who is also transformer of times of crisis, I respect that Marianne Williamson wants to treat drugs as a health issue rather than a criminal issue to help people get back on their feet!!
#Marianne2024
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
405d
I don’t want a Drug Czar: I want a Recovery Czar. #EndTheWarOnDrugs #SmashTheMachine

The statement by @NeverfallNM constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the beliefs and qualifications of a public figure, Marianne Williamson, in the context of her stance on drug policy. The statement by @NeverfallNM is dismissive and derogatory, potentially violating several principles of respectful and constructive public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @NeverfallNM does harm by mocking and dismissing Marianne Williamson's beliefs in a derogatory manner. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Marianne Williamson, as it engages in cyberbullying by ridiculing her beliefs. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it ridicules and dismisses a person's beliefs without engaging in a constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the substance of Marianne Williamson's policy stance. (-2 points) [-2]