Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the potential actions and concerns of a public figure (Mitt Romney) in the context of a significant political event (a potential Trump win). The statement touches on themes of political retaliation, personal safety, and the broader implications for public figures in a contentious political climate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a scenario where harm could occur, which is a nuanced approach to discussing potential threats. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It discusses a public figure's concerns in a respectful manner. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential risks faced by public figures in a polarized political environment, fostering empathy and awareness. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents a scenario based on reported facts and concerns. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.