The statement and accompanying image primarily serve to promote an event at Stanford HAI featuring a conversation between two individuals. While it mentions a return to AI and highlights a personal connection, it does not substantively engage with public issues or contribute to civic dialogue. Therefore, it does not constitute public discourse.
- The statement does no harm and is positive in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on professional admiration. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and appreciation of a colleague. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is constructive and does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There are no mistakes to acknowledge or correct.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to promote an event that could benefit society by discussing AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.