Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant historical event (the murder of Emmett Till) and connects it to contemporary political rhetoric, thereby engaging with public issues and contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It references a historical event and its relevance to current political rhetoric without inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by drawing parallels between historical and contemporary political rhetoric, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the content of the book and the historical context. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting a book that discusses a significant historical event and its relevance to current issues, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by promoting a book that contributes to public understanding of historical and contemporary issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.